Feedback on SecureSearch indicates mixed experiences, primarily centered around challenges with its pricing model and past limitations in Rock RMS integration. Some users found the per-background-check cost prohibitively high, especially when individual ministries bore the expense—occasionally resulting in extremely costly checks. Additionally, earlier versions of the integration were considered insufficiently functional or overly complex. However, there is acknowledgment that improvements may have been made since those initial issues.
Learn More About our Survey Methodology
All reviews in this survey were voluntarily submitted by members of the community, and Spark has
refrained providing any ratings themselves. The overall ratings presented in this report
represent an average of the community's individual ratings. The comments provided by
participants have been consistently summarized using ChatGPT with the guiding prompt below.
Below are a series of comments from a survey we did on a Rock RMS integrated partner SecureSearch. Please summarize the comments in a way that is professional, concise, and
accurate and in a single paragraph.
It's important to note that a very small subset of ratings was excluded from the analysis for the
following reasons:
- Submissions that provided a rating score but accompanied it with comments indicating they
had insufficient knowledge of the service.
- Ratings submitted by integrated partners who rated either themselves or their competitors
were omitted from the analysis. These ratings were deemed potentially biased due to a
perceived conflict of interest.