Feedback on Studio C is largely critical, with users expressing concerns about its high cost, limited value add, and reliance on full access to the Rock RMS database—raising security and operational concerns. While some appreciated the aesthetics of Studio C's templates, many felt the functionality it offers can already be achieved within Rock itself, given the right internal resources. Users also noted a lack of deep understanding of Rock's capabilities by the Studio C team and questioned the return on investment, citing minimal differentiation and a significant incident where their Rock instance was accidentally taken offline.
Learn More About our Survey Methodology
All reviews in this survey were voluntarily submitted by members of the community, and Spark has
refrained providing any ratings themselves. The overall ratings presented in this report
represent an average of the community's individual ratings. The comments provided by
participants have been consistently summarized using ChatGPT with the guiding prompt below.
Below are a series of comments from a survey we did on a Rock RMS integrated partner Studio C. Please summarize the comments in a way that is professional, concise, and
accurate and in a single paragraph.
It's important to note that a very small subset of ratings was excluded from the analysis for the
following reasons:
- Submissions that provided a rating score but accompanied it with comments indicating they
had insufficient knowledge of the service.
- Ratings submitted by integrated partners who rated either themselves or their competitors
were omitted from the analysis. These ratings were deemed potentially biased due to a
perceived conflict of interest.