Feedback on Subsplash is mixed, with many users recognizing it as a solid solution—especially for smaller churches—offering user-friendly mobile app capabilities, media tools, and basic website features. Churches appreciate its ease of setup, reliable support, and recent progress in improving Rock RMS integration. However, limitations around flexibility, customization, and data syncing have led several organizations to outgrow the platform or begin transitioning to Rock Mobile for more advanced functionality and tighter integration. Some users expressed frustration with account transitions, plugin shortcomings (particularly for financial features), and a perceived shift in focus toward monetization. While still seen as a viable plug-and-play option, particularly for churches with limited tech resources, many users now view Subsplash as a temporary or stepping-stone solution rather than a long-term fit within the Rock ecosystem.
Learn More About our Survey Methodology
All reviews in this survey were voluntarily submitted by members of the community, and Spark has
refrained providing any ratings themselves. The overall ratings presented in this report
represent an average of the community's individual ratings. The comments provided by
participants have been consistently summarized using ChatGPT with the guiding prompt below.
Below are a series of comments from a survey we did on a Rock RMS integrated partner Subsplash. Please summarize the comments in a way that is professional, concise, and
accurate and in a single paragraph.
It's important to note that a very small subset of ratings was excluded from the analysis for the
following reasons:
- Submissions that provided a rating score but accompanied it with comments indicating they
had insufficient knowledge of the service.
- Ratings submitted by integrated partners who rated either themselves or their competitors
were omitted from the analysis. These ratings were deemed potentially biased due to a
perceived conflict of interest.