The comments suggest dissatisfaction with Studio C's integration with Rock RMS. The respondent feels that Studio C does not fully understand how Rock operates, despite offering a decent middleware option. They criticize Studio C's marketing and program promotion services, stating that they have not increased congregation interaction as promised. They also express concerns about the high implementation costs, monthly usage charges, and the requirement for a secondary staging database. The respondent also mentions security concerns related to data storage and ownership, as well as performance issues on the Rock database due to the data pull and queries required by Studio C's staging database. They conclude by stating they would not recommend Studio C due to these issues.
Learn More About our Survey Methodology
All reviews in this survey were voluntarily submitted by members of the community, and Spark has refrained providing any ratings themselves. The overall ratings presented in this report represent an average of the community's individual ratings. The comments provided by participants have been consistently summarized using ChatGPT with the guiding prompt below.
Below are a series of comments from a survey we did on a Rock RMS integrated partner . Please summarize the comments in a way that is professional, concise, accurate.
It's important to note that a very small subset of ratings was excluded from the analysis for the following reasons:
- Submissions that provided a rating score but accompanied it with comments indicating they had insufficient knowledge of the service.
- Ratings submitted by integrated partners who rated either themselves or their competitors were omitted from the analysis. These ratings were deemed potentially biased due to a perceived conflict of interest.